Will the pandemic result in a better version of the store visit?
Phil Thorne considers the role of the time- and carbon-heavy Store Visit. With such a great pause forced upon us, many are indulging in...
How do I plan in a post Covid world?
It’s a question in our daily lives – many have had to cancel holidays, birthdays, and weddings. It’s an even bigger topic of discussion in the business world, with many operations and finance teams debating how to effectively plan under uncertainty and ambiguity.
Is planning dead? was the provocative title of a panel I joined recently. In the lead-up, I had the opportunity to talk to a number of leaders to get their thoughts on the topic. The visceral reaction from most was an emphatic “no” -but then a pause. Most realize that in a world with such uncertainty, reality is unlikely to align with our plans. There is also a realization that there are major flaws in how businesses currently plan, which need to be ironed out quickly.
So, is planning dead? We should start off with asking ourselves why we plan in the first place.
“If you fail to plan you are planning to fail”
Planning at its heart is a decision-making activity. Plans are simply the articulation of the actions you intend to undertake to hit your desired goals, best summarised by three activities.
The first part of planning is to step back and understand in detail the current state of play. It sets the scene for any decisions the company or individual can then take.
The next stage is to evaluate the actions you can take based on current information, with consideration to the strategy of the organization and it’s existing resources. This is a balancing of the benefits against the risks of those alternatives to come to a conclusive decision on how to act.
Aligning, resourcing, and motivating teams to act, but also understanding and overcoming resistance, anxiety, and limitations.
Done best, this is a continuous process where new learnings get built in to adapt the plan.
This description of planning and its benefits is uncontroversial, but the value is in the understanding of where it breaks down.
The below list is unlikely to be exhaustive but outlines some of the key frictions we have seen to successful planning.
Intelligence gathering in organizations is mostly poor. For instance, the median cycle time for the annual budget cycle is 32 days. Even during less volatile times, the data is automatically out of date when it’s collected. The result is often that any data is ignored and, as many a senior executive has said to me, “decisions get made from the back of an envelope calculation.”
Most people believe that planning is a purely financial activity. It is also often communicated that way and planning and analysis teams mostly sit within finance teams. Plans are often communicated as “increasing revenues by 5%”, “reduce costs by 10%”, or “improve margin by 2 points”. Not only is the way finance-speak is conveyed non-understandable to the majority of people without an accounting degree, it is also ridiculously unactionable. “How do I do that?” is the exasperated demand of most operators when they see such a plan.
The world has a wonderful ability to tear up even the most thorough and well-presented models from business analysts. Despite this, when plans and budgets don’t hit the model’s expectations, people start getting blamed. This situation is only worsened due to plans being in 12 month or quarterly cycles. Especially now, the situation can often change within weeks.
Rather than sit down and learn what happened and iterate, people just either get performance managed out of the business or go to great pains to explain their performance.
With incentive compensation often aligned to plans and budgets, it provides the strongest of incentives to distort a plan. Planning becomes a game of power and negotiation rather than seeking value and the truth. It also doesn’t help the planning process when the teams actioning and formulating them are divorced from each other in separate functions.
It is rare to meet an organization where employees take ownership of plans. They feel neither ownership nor purpose around them. Planning needs to be aligned and collaborative, but people also need to know how their plans fit the overall objectives of the company.
These frictions are mostly not hard to remove, and organizations with the right mindset can remediate quickly. Here are recommendations for the first steps.
I might be a broken record on this, but getting your data structured in a way that gives you a clear picture of what is going on in your business will be a key differentiator for companies. For retailers, see some ideas here.
Get rid of all financial acronyms. Use the language that operators use day in day out. Get granular.
For example, rather than requesting a 10% reduction in employee cost, break it down into operational language. Language like “limit overtime to no more than 2 hours on a Thursday” is more direct and actionable.
Quorso data shows that when a specific plan is actioned for three weeks, 85% of the resulting benefit remains for the next nine months. Planning needs to become an adaptive learning process, where companies adjust as they learn what is going right, and what is going wrong.
Firstly, planning and analysis should not sit within finance. As it’s core to business operations, it should sit with the business decision-makers. Its place in a separate team creates negative dynamics. Secondly, align any incentives to overall business goals and be flexible to changing them if they do not support the business at this time.
This will be the hardest thing to get right: creating an environment where people feel a joint sense of purpose to get the business achieving its goals. Although difficult, it is perhaps the most necessary component to transform planning into something that allows adaptation and success in the new normal.
So, planning isn’t dead after all. If anything, it’s vital lifeblood to a successful organization and ensures the best operational decisions are being made. Too often it is seen as a routine activity divorced from the true needs of the business, but fix its frictions and it can be incredibly beneficial – even in a world as uncertain as this one.